community-based, non-corporate, participatory media

About Contact Us Policies Mailing Lists Radio Video Publish! Calendar Search

View article without comments

Indy media fails ballot box democracy
by Maggie Thursday, Apr. 29, 2004 at 3:06 AM

primary election; HAVA; candidate; media; voters

With the April 27, 2004, primary election, Pennsylvania implemented its new rules under the state version of the Help America Vote Act. The requirements of identification are designed so that low-income citizens and other citizens who do not get noticed by the ruling classes often will face difficulty in proving they are eligible to vote.

When Pennsylvania held four public hearings on the new rules in the Summer of 2003, only 16 people testified. Fifteen of those people were public election officials, advocates for narrowly-focused groups (e.g., disabled voters), and companies with interest in elections. Only one person appears to have been a private citizen. Where were the members of the news media, corporate and independent, in promoting these hearings, and their issues, consequences, and outcomes?

For people who have moved to Pennsylvania in the last three years, and never voted in the state in a presidential election year, there were few, if any, instructions on how to vote offered by the news media, corporate or independent. If it had not been for Jim Ferlo commenting at a rally for Dennis Kucinich that voters needed to select both the candidate and the individuals to vote for the candidate in the electoral college, this writer would never have known the Pennsylvania process.

This writer still wonders if Green Party members, as well as other non-Republican/Democrat voters, were eligible to vote on the ballot question about issuing bonds for water/sewer infrastructure expenditures that was part of the primary ballot. If they were not eligible, what does that mean for democracy?

In addition, there was very little coverage of contests and the ballot question, beyond the presidential and Republican senate races. Even in the contests for nomination for state attorney general there was little acknowledgment of the contest in the general media. This writer was not aware of the three challengers for the Democratic nomination until the day before the primary, and only found out the names of the candidates from a chance reading of a specialized publication. Yet, the state attorney general will have as much direct impact upon daily lives of people in Pennsylvania as will the president. From consumer protection to college tuition to free speech and municipal police actions, the state attorney general's beliefs will determine what receives attention in Pennsylvania.

Americans and residents of Pennsylvania can attend all the pro-choice protests they want, can write all the reports about visits to Iraq they want, and can bemoan the uniformity of the established political parties all they want, but unless they vote and have realistic opportunities to be informed about their ballot-box choices, the protests, reports, and moans will be for naught. This writer would like to see independent media readers share experiences of having to prove identity at the polls and to use provisional ballots, as well as sharing information on local ballot box procedures and choices.


add your comments

Ballot boxes fail us all
by Why dignify? Thursday, Apr. 29, 2004 at 7:38 AM

What has voting done for you lately?

add your comments

by somejerk Tuesday, May. 04, 2004 at 6:52 AM

more than not voting has done for anyone....

add your comments

Just Vote
by Why dignify? Tuesday, May. 04, 2004 at 7:17 AM

Just Vote...
24.jpg, image/jpeg, 929x310

We'll do the rest...

add your comments

Apathy or Disgust?
by Maggie Monday, May. 10, 2004 at 4:45 PM

Politicos group people who do not vote out of disgust with people who do not vote out of apathy. I vote to avoid the apathy label, but as voting systems are advanced, I find my options to protest through the vote reduced. Try not to vote on an optically-read ballot and you will get beeped by a machine alerting you to the alleged error; the same is true with multiple votes for one office. With a punch card ballot, the paper can be torn in protest, but try doing that with a mechanical lever system. I feel as though the wide variety of comments that Americans can express through the ballot box have been reduced by so-called advancements in efficiency and accuracy.

add your comments

by IS Thursday, May. 13, 2004 at 8:15 AM

Speaking as a registered independent I was able to vote on the sewer provisions.

add your comments

Make your vote count
by G. Fawkes Thursday, May. 13, 2004 at 8:26 AM

Be sure your rifle is scoped.

add your comments

Voting is...
by Earl Scheib Wednesday, Jun. 09, 2004 at 9:41 AM

...a fresh coat of paint on crumbling building.

add your comments

© 2001-2009 Pittsburgh Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not endorsed by the Pittsburgh Independent Media Center.
Disclaimer | Privacy